Not necessarily. It's easy to just to an "if only" conclusion with these things, but there are plenty of performance this year that might look irresistable at award time, and might have beaten Kate or Annette anyway. Huffman, Allen, and Witherspoon are all looking strong.
Okay, maybe not Kate. But I definitely think Annette would've had it.
But what a battle would it have been with Allen, Bening and Winslet in the mix. Three ladies with something like 11 nominations between them and 0 wins.
I think Imelda would have been a formidable threat for the win last year had Swank not factored into the race. 3 noms for Vera Drake and only 1 for Being Julia... It would have been a nail-biter to the end - Bening with the owed sentimental vote and Staunton with the raves on her side.
Yeah, I curse M$B to this day. If it had just never been finished in time, then:
-Marty would have an oscar -Annette (or Kate or Imelda) would have an oscar -Uma would have been nominated -either Clive Owen or Thomas Hayden Church would've won supporting actor -there would have been much more suspense in both aforementioned acting categories -Swank would not have more oscars than Meryl Streep
Glenn is a twentysomething freelance writer from Melbourne, Australia. Apart from this blog he is the film editor for Onya Magazine and writes regularly for Trespass Magazine. His work has appeared in The Big Issue, Encore Magazine, Forte Magazine, The Film Experience Blog and was the film correspondent for The Outland Institute radio program on JOY 94.4.
Stale Popcorn, noun, 1. A veritable cornucopia of movie geekdom, celebrity worship, Australian film discussion and all with occasional musical interludes! All wrapped up in the salty buttery taste of movie popcorn that's been sitting in the box for too long. What's not to love?
Everything that is written on this webpage - Stale Popcorn and any tangents from it - is written by me, Glenn Dunks, unless otherwise stated. It is appreciated that if you wish to reproduce any of that you do so with an appropriate link (please do not copy it all because that gives your reader no reason to come by here and possibly increase my traffic).
If any pictures or music files are posted on Stale Popcorn that are owned by you and wish to be credited for or have removed please feel free to send me an email using one of the addresses at the top of the page. I will gladly oblige.
5 comments:
Not necessarily. It's easy to just to an "if only" conclusion with these things, but there are plenty of performance this year that might look irresistable at award time, and might have beaten Kate or Annette anyway. Huffman, Allen, and Witherspoon are all looking strong.
Okay, maybe not Kate. But I definitely think Annette would've had it.
But what a battle would it have been with Allen, Bening and Winslet in the mix. Three ladies with something like 11 nominations between them and 0 wins.
I think Imelda would have been a formidable threat for the win last year had Swank not factored into the race. 3 noms for Vera Drake and only 1 for Being Julia... It would have been a nail-biter to the end - Bening with the owed sentimental vote and Staunton with the raves on her side.
Well, it's not like Annette didn't have a bunch of glowing reviews to her credit either.
It's just that the film wasn't the best.
If Hilary were a non-factor last year, then... well... immense possibilities (Uma being nominated for one)
Yeah, I curse M$B to this day. If it had just never been finished in time, then:
-Marty would have an oscar
-Annette (or Kate or Imelda) would have an oscar
-Uma would have been nominated
-either Clive Owen or Thomas Hayden Church would've won supporting actor
-there would have been much more suspense in both aforementioned acting categories
-Swank would not have more oscars than Meryl Streep
Gah!
Post a Comment